Procesos de vinculación colaborativa-reticular como potenciales de desarrollo en Naupan, Puebla, México
Collaborative-reticular linkage processes as development potentials in Naupan, Puebla, Mexico
Abstract
Objective: This study focuses on identifying and analyzing the links that emerge among the territorial agents in the municipality of Naupan, Puebla. The research seeks to understand how the actions of these actors shape both the local social fabric and the productive structure. The central objective is to examine the interaction between these elements to understand their influence on the definition and direction of territorial development. Methodology: A mixed-methods approach was employed, including the administration of questionnaires to 109 heads of productive family units. This generated a pathway to test items related to organizational scope and collaborative actions of producers using a multivariate statistical technique that supported the design and identification of latent variables. Results: The results indicate the establishment of actions with high recursive capabilities. Although no significant incidence was observed between institutional actions and capacity management, a significant correlation was found in the capacity for endogenous organization, which is derived from the process of link-building among producers. Limitations: The study is limited to identifying qualitative variables that are correlated with other linked (partial) variables. The theoretical framework of territorial analysis was the basis for constructing the structural model, making it a unique model for theoretical-empirical contrast. Conclusions: The identified factors contribute to the development of capabilities and positively influence the processes that shape and empower the territory from a local perspective.
Keywords:
regional development, development potentials, territory, linkage, agency, collaborationAbstract
Objective: This study focuses on identifying and analyzing the links that emerge among the territorial agents in the municipality of Naupan, Puebla. The research seeks to understand how the actions of these actors shape both the local social fabric and the productive structure. The central objective is to examine the interaction between these elements to understand their influence on the definition and direction of territorial development. Methodology: A mixed-methods approach was employed, including the administration of questionnaires to 109 heads of productive family units. This generated a pathway to test items related to organizational scope and collaborative actions of producers using a multivariate statistical technique that supported the design and identification of latent variables. Results: The results indicate the establishment of actions with high recursive capabilities. Although no significant incidence was observed between institutional actions and capacity management, a significant correlation was found in the capacity for endogenous organization, which is derived from the process of link-building among producers. Limitations: The study is limited to identifying qualitative variables that are correlated with other linked (partial) variables. The theoretical framework of territorial analysis was the basis for constructing the structural model, making it a unique model for theoretical-empirical contrast. Conclusions: The identified factors contribute to the development of capabilities and positively influence the processes that shape and empower the territory from a local perspective.
Keywords:
regional development, development potentials, territory, linkage, agency, collaborationDownloads
References
Ahmad, M. S. y Abu Talib, N. B. (2015). Empowering local communities: decentralization, empowerment, and community driven development. Qual Quant 49, 827-838, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0025-8
Ángel, C. G. y Hernández, R. M. (2018) Territorio y universidad, un proceso de innovación para la vinculación. Teorías y experiencias en el sur-sureste mexicano, En J. Delgadillo, I. González y J. Lee (Ed.), Agenciamiento de desarrollo e Incidencia Territorial Teorías y experiencias en el Sur-Sureste Mexicano, p. 125-148. México, UNAM.
Bock, B. B. (2016). Rural Marginalisation and the Role of Social Innovation. A Turn Towards Nexogenous Development and Rural Reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(4), 552-573, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12119
Chin, W.W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. En V. Esposito, W.W Chin, J. Henseler y H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Coceots, Methods and Applications (pp. 655-690). Berlín, Alemania: Springer, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8
Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (Conanp, 2024). Información Espacial de las Áreas Naturales Protegidas. México. Recuperado de http://sig.conanp.gob.mx/website/pagsig/info_shape.htm
Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social (Coneval, 2022). Medición de la pobreza. México. Recuperado de https://www.coneval.org.mx/Medicion/Paginas/PobrezaInicio.aspx
Coneval (2020). Medición de la pobreza. México. Recuperado de https://www.coneval.org.mx/Medicion/Paginas/PobrezaInicio.aspx
Delgadillo, J., González, I., Gudiño, A. y Lee, V. E. (2016). El concepto de agenciamiento de desarrollo. Una propuesta para pensar el desarrollo en el contexto actual. México: IIEc-UNAM
Gobierno de México (2022). Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. México. Recuperado de https://www.gob.mx/agricultura/articulos/cultivo-de-cafe-en-mexico
Gobierno Municipal de Naupan (2021-2024). Plan Municipal de Desarrollo, Municipio de Naupan, Puebla. Puebla, México. Recuperado de https://planeader.puebla.gob.mx/pdf/Municipales2021/Naupan_PMD_2021%20-2024.pdf
Gobierno Municipal de Naupan (2018-2021). Plan de desarrollo municipal 2018-2021. Puebla, México. Recuperado de https://planeader.puebla.gob.mx/PDF/Municipales2020/Naupan.pdf
Gómez, D., Pérez, M. y Curbelo, I. (2005). Gestión del conocimiento y su importancia en las organizaciones. Ingeniería Industrial, 26(2), 37-46. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=360433559006
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
Fougère, M., Segercrantz, B. y Seeck, H. (2017). A critical reading of the European Union’s social innovation policy discourse:(Re) legitimizing neoliberalism. Organization, 24(6), 819-843, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508416685171
Haxeltine, A., Avelino, F., Pel, B., Dumitru, A., Kemp, R., Longhurst, N., Chilvers, J. y Wittmayer, J.M. (2016). A framework for Transformative Social Innovation (TRANSIT Working Paper # 5), TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30337.86880
Herrera, O. B., Parra, M., Livscovsky, I., Ramos, P. y Gallardo, D. (2019). Lifeways and territorial innovation: Values and practices for promoting collective appropriation of territory. Community Development Journal, 54(3), doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsx052
Holmen, A. K. T. y Fosse, J. K. (2017). Regional agency and constitution of new paths: a study of agency in early formation of new paths on the west coast of Norway. European Planning Studies, 25, 498-515, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1276159
Howaldt, J., Domanski, D. y Kaletka, C. (2016). Social innovation: Towards a new innovation paradigm. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17(6), 20-44. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=195449449003
Huggins, R. y Thompson, P. (2022). Human agency, network dynamics and regional development: the behavioural principles of new path creation. Regional Studies. Recuperado de https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/46296/1/1544912_Thompson.pdf
Hutchinson, D. y Eversole, R. (2023). Local agency and development trajectories in a rural region. Regional Studies, 57(8), doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2108543
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI, 2020). Subsistema de Información Demográfica y Social, Censo de Población y Vivienda 2020. México. Recuperado de https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/ccpv/2020/
INEGI (2023). Geografía y Medio Ambiente. México. Recuperado de https://www.inegi.org.mx/temas/topografia/
Isaksen, A. y Jakobsen, S. E. (2017). New path development between innovation systems and individual actors. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 355-370, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1268570
Kapellmann, G. (2005). Redes de conocimiento en apoyo a proyectos comunitarios. Revista de Innovación Educativa, 5(26) 47-53. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=179421475005
López, M. I. y García, L. N. (2022). El papel de las redes de cooperación en la gestión del conocimiento para el desarrollo territorial rural en Latinoamérica. Revista Agroalimentaria, 28(54), 17-34, doi: https://www.doi.org/10.53766/Agroalim/2022.28.54.02
Macías, J. D., Valadez, I. G., Cortés, J. V. L. y López, Z. P. (2018). Estudio introductorio. El Índice de Agenciamiento de Desarrollo. Origen y metodología. En J. Delgadillo, I. González y J. Lee (Ed.), Agenciamiento de desarrollo e Incidencia Territorial Teorías y experiencias en el Sur-Sureste Mexicano, p. 11-42. México: UNAM.
Mantino, F. (2021). Rural areas between locality and global networks. Local development mechanisms and the role of policies empowering rural actors. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 10(4), 265-281, doi: https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-12364
Malerba, F. y McKelvey, M. (2020). Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems. Small Business Economics, 54(2), 503-522, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0060-2
Miörner, J. (2022). Contextualizar la agencia en el desarrollo de nuevos caminos: cómo la selectividad del sistema da forma a la capacidad de reconfiguración regional. Estudios regionales, 56 (4), 592-604, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1854713
Meinzen-Dick, R., DiGregorio, M. y McCarthy, N. (2004). Methods for Studying Collective Action in Rural Development. Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, 82(3), 197-214, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2004.07.006
Moulaert, F., Mehmood, A., MacCallum, D. y Leubolt, B. (2017). Social innovation as a trigger for transformations The Role of Research, doi. http://dx.doi.org/10.2777/68949
Moulaert, F., Jessop, B. y Mehmood, A. (2016). Agency, structure, institutions, discourse (ASID) in urban and regional development. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 20(2), 167-187, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2016.1182054
Nilsen, T., Grillitsch, M. y Hauge, A. (2023). Varieties of periphery and local agency in regional development. Regional Studies, 57(4), 749-762, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2106364
Pel, B., Haxeltine, A., Avelino, F., Dumitru, A., Kemp, R., Bauler, T., Kunze, I., Dorland, J., Wittmayer, J. y Jørgensen, M. S. (2020). Towards a theory of transformative social innovation: A relational framework and 12 propositions. Research Policy, 49(8), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104080
Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A. y Tomaney, J. (2016). Local and regional development. Routledge, doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315767673
Ramírez, J. R., Arias, A. Y. y Marulanda, C. (2016). Estimación del índice de agencia humana: el caso de la ciudad de San José de Cúcuta (Colombia). Revista de Economía del Caribe, (18), 92-118.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S. y Becker, J. M. (2024). "SmartPLS 4" Bönningstedt: SmartPLS (4.0) [Software informático]. Recuperado de https://www.smartpls.com
Ringle, C. M., da Silva, D. y Bido, D. de S. (2014). Modelagem de Equações Estruturais com Utilização do Smartpls. ReMark-Revista Brasileira De Marketing, 13(2), 56-73, doi: https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v13i2.2717
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M. y Hair, J. F. (2021) Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. En C. Homburg, M. Klarmann y A. E. Vomberg (eds), Handbook of Market Research. Springer, Cham, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2
Sen, A. K. (1998). Capital humano y capacidad humana. Cuadernos de economía, 17(29), 67-72. Recuperado de https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ceconomia/article/view/11496
Sotarauta, M. (2014). Territorial knowledge leadership in policy networks: A peripheral region of South Ostrobothnia, Finland as a case in point. En The social dynamics of innovation networks (pp. 42-59). Estados Unidos: Routledge.
Sotarauta, M. y Grillitsch, M. (2023). Studying human agency in regional development. Regional Studies, 57(8), 1409- 1414, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2217224
Torre, A. (2023). Contribution to the theory of territorial development: a territorial innovations approach. Regional Studies, 1-16, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2193218
Torre, A., Wallet, F. y Huang, J. (2023). A collaborative and multidisciplinary approach to knowledge-based rural development: 25 years of the PSDR program in France. Journal of Rural Studies, 97, 428-437, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.12.034
Tuitjer, G. y Küpper, P. (2020). How Knowledge-Based Local and Global Networks Foster Innovations in Rural Areas. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 33(3), 9-29, doi: https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.033.0009
Wellbrock, W., Roep, D. y Wiskerke, J.S.C (2012). An integrated perspective on rural regional learning. European Countryside, 4(1), 1-16, doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10091-012-0010-y
Yáñez-Romo, V., Muñoz-Parra, C. y Dziekonski-Rüchard, M. (2016). Reconocimiento de la vulnerabilidad socio- territorial desde una construcción metodológica. Revista AUS, (20), 56-61.
Yin, X., Chen, J. y Li, J. (2022). Rural innovation system: Revitalize the countryside for a sustainable development. Journal of Rural Studies, 93, 471-478, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.014
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Ma. Concepción Alvarado-Méndez, Javier Delgadillo-Macías, Cristina Romera-Tébar, Antonio Mendoza-Hernández
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Para que sean publicados artículos, ensayos y reseñas críticas en Estudios Sociales, la revista debe contar con la aceptación de parte de los autores/autoras de las condiciones siguientes:
1. Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación del trabajo registrado bajo la licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial (CC-By-NC) que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado, siempre y cuando mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
2. Los autores pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (por ejemplo: incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre y cuando indiquen, claramente, que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
