La difusión de la cultura chinampera en niños de la Ciudad de México: impulsando una iniciativa de innovación social

The dissemination of chinampera culture in children of Mexico City: Promoting a social innovation initiative

https://doi.org/10.24836/es.v32i60.1232

Authors

Abstract

Objective: Analyze the conception, implementation and results of a social innovation initiative generated and promoted by a cooperative chinampera Xochimilco, in collaboration with the Instituto Politécnico Nacional; whose purpose is to promote chinampera culture and environmental awareness in preschool children from suburban areas in Mexico City. Methodology: A qualitative case study was carried out based on a methodological triangulation with document analysis, participant observation and field diary. Results: The work manages to show, in an empirical way, the process of gestating and implementing a social innovation initiative at the local level, through collaboration between different actors such as the community and the academy. Limitations: The main study limitation is the number of children participating in the project, although the effectiveness of a social innovation initiative does not depend on the number of participants but on the positive impact it can achieve, it is pertinent to replicate this project with more children from Mexico City for a wider scope. Conclusions: It is concluded that this work gives rise to a future agenda of linkage where such initiatives continue to be promoted, through other projects involving educational institutions in collaboration with the community.

Keywords:

regional development, social innovation, chinampera culture, Xochimilco, environment, Childhood

Abstract

Objective: Analyze the conception, implementation and results of a social innovation initiative generated and promoted by a cooperative chinampera Xochimilco, in collaboration with the Instituto Politécnico Nacional; whose purpose is to promote chinampera culture and environmental awareness in preschool children from suburban areas in Mexico City. Methodology: A qualitative case study was carried out based on a methodological triangulation with document analysis, participant observation and field diary. Results: The work manages to show, in an empirical way, the process of gestating and implementing a social innovation initiative at the local level, through collaboration between different actors such as the community and the academy. Limitations: The main study limitation is the number of children participating in the project, although the effectiveness of a social innovation initiative does not depend on the number of participants but on the positive impact it can achieve, it is pertinent to replicate this project with more children from Mexico City for a wider scope. Conclusions: It is concluded that this work gives rise to a future agenda of linkage where such initiatives continue to be promoted, through other projects involving educational institutions in collaboration with the community.

Keywords:

regional development, social innovation, chinampera culture, Xochimilco, environment, Childhood

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ardill, N. y Lemes de Oliveira, F. (2018). Social innovation in urban spaces. International Journal of Urban Sustain-able Development, 10(3), 207-221. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2018.1526177

Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J. M., Pel, B., Weaver, P., Dumitru, A., Haxeltime, A., Kemp, R., Jørgensen, M. S., Bauler, T., Ruijsink, S. y O'Riordan, T. (2019). Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment. Technolog-ical Forecasting & Social Change, 145, 195-206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.002

Caroli, M. G., Fracassi, E., Maiolini, R. y Carnini-Pulino, S. (2018). Exploring Social Innovation Components and Attributes: A Taxonomy Proposal. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 9(2), 94-109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1448296

Castro-Arce, K., Parra, C. y Vanclay, F. (2019). Social innovation, sustainability and the governance of protected areas: revealing theory as it plays out in practice in Costa Rica. Journal of Environmental Planning and Man-agement, 62, 1-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1537976

Chin, T., Yang, Y., Zhang, P., Yu, X. y Cao, L. (2019). Co-creation of social innovation: corporate universities as innovate strategies for Chinese firms to engage with society. Sustainability, 11(5), 1-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051438

Chinampayolo (2018). Informe Anual Chinampayolo. Logros 2018. Cinco elementos. México: Editado por Chinam-payolo.

Chinampayolo (2019). Lecciones para la construcción y organización social chinampera. Editado por Chinampayolo.

Cordero, S. (2008). El jardín de piedra. Las flores en la arquitectura de Xochimilco. Artes de México. Xochimilco, (20), 58-61.

Cox, A. M., Tiago, J. y Rivera, G. (2020). Reassessing the LIS approach to traditional knowledge: learning from Xochimilco, Mexico City. Journal of Documentation, 76(5), 981-997. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-10-2019-0195

Domanski, D., Howaldt, J. y Kaletka, C. (2020). A comprehensive concept of social innovation and its implications for the local context-on the growing importance of social innovation ecosystems and infrastructures. Euro-pean Planning Studies, 28(3), 454-474. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1639397

Dufays, F. (2018). Exploring the drivers of tensions in social innovation management in the context of social entrepre-neurial teams. Management Decision, 57(6), 1344-1362. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2017-0089

Dufétel, D. (2008). El Jardín Onírico. Pequeña historia de las chinampas y tres sueños. Artes de México. Xochimilco, (20), 20-29.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO, 2018). Chinamperos comparten experiencias de con-servación de suelo y agua. Recuperado de http://www.fao.org/mexico/noticias/detail-events/en/c/1158531/

Feola, G. y Nunes, R. (2014). Success and failure grassroots innovations for addressing climate change: The case of the Transition Movement. Global Environmental Change, 24, 232-250. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloen-vcha.2013.11.011

González, E. y Torres, C. I. (2014). La sustentabilidad agrícola de las chinampas en el Valle de México: caso Xochi-milco. Revista Mexicana de Agronegocios, 34, 699-709. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/ar-ticulo.oa?id=14131514005

Guadarrama, V. H. y Acosta, A. (2017). Ecosistema de Innovación Social en México. Foro Consultivo y Tecnológico, A. C., Conacyt.

Lam, D. P., Hinz, E., Lang, D. J., Tengö, M., Von-Wehrden, H. y Martín-López, B. (2020). Indigenous and local knowledge in sustainability transformations research: a literature review. Ecology and Society, 25(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11305-250103

Lubberink, R., Blok, V., Van Ophem, J. y Omta, O. (2019). Responsible innovation by social entrepreneurs: an ex-ploratory study of values integration in innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 6(2), 179-210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1572374

McPhearson, T., Andersson, E., Elmqvist, T. y Frantzeskaki, N. (2015). Resilience of and through urban ecosystem services. Ecosystems Services, 12, 152-156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012

Mendoza, X. A. (2018). Las chinampas del humedal de Xochimilco: sistemas de biorremediación para la sostenibili-dad (Tesis de ¨maestría no publicada). El Colegio de la Frontera Norte. Recuperado de https://www.co-lef.mx/posgrado/tesis/20161307/

Molano, O. L. (2007). Identidad cultural un concepto que evoluciona. Revista Opera, (7), 69-84. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4020258

Montoya, M. T. y Barba, A. (2015). Estudio de caso y organizaciones. Método, investigación y praxis. En I. Rivera y A. De la Rosa (coords.), La Mipyme a debate. Perspectivas de estudio, mitos, actores clave, propuestas y vinculación (pp. 51-67). Gasca, Investigadores de México: Competitive Press.

Narchi, N. y Canabal, B. (2017). Percepciones de la degradación ambiental entre vecinos y chinamperos del Lago de Xochimilco. Sociedad y Ambiente, (12), 5-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.31840/sya.v0i12.1740

Neumeier, S. (2017). Social innovation in rural development: identifying the key factors to success. Geographical Journal, 183(1), 34-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12180

Oganisjana, K., Surikova, S., Kozlovskis, K. y Svirina, A. (2018). Financial, organizational and informative involve-ment of the society in social innovation processes in Latvia. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(1), 456-471. doi: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.1(28)

Okuda-Benavides, M. y Gómez-Restrepo, C. (2005). Métodos en investigación cualitativa: triangulación. Revista Co-lombiana de Psiquiatría, XXXIV(1), 118-124. recuperado de https://www.re-dalyc.org/pdf/806/80628403009.pdf

Pérez-Belmont, P., Joseph, L. C., Valiente, E., y Hiriart, M. M. (2017). Xochimilco y sus chinampas: lecciones del sismo del 19 de septiembre, 2017. Oikos=, (20). Recuperado de http://web.ecologia.unam.mx/oikos3.0/in-dex.php/todos-los-numeros/articulos-anteriores/363-xochimilco-sostenible

Pitt-Catsouphes, M. y Cosner-Berzin, S. (2015). Teaching Note- Incorporating Social Innovation Content into Macro Social Work Education. Journal of Social Work Education, 51(2), 407-416. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2015.1012947

Prakash-Kala, C. (2017). Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources through Spirituality. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 5(2), 24-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.12691/aees-5-2-1

Robles, B., Flores, J., Martínez, J. L. y Herrera, P. (2018). The chinampa: an ancient Mexican sub-irrigation system. Irrigation and Drainage, 64(1), 155-122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2310

Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly. 28, 339-358. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2392246

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Estados unidos: Sage Publications.

Torres-Lima, P. A. y Cruz-Castillo, J. G. (2019). Procesos urbanos y sistemas socioecológicos. Trayectorias sustenta-bles de la agricultura de chinampa en Ciudad de México. Letras Verdes. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Socioambientales, (25), 168-189. doi: https://doi.org/10.17141/letrasverdes.25.2019.3368

Torres-Porras, J., Alcántara, J., Arrebola, J. C., Rubio, S. J. y Mora, M. (2017). Trabajando el acercamiento a la natu-raleza de los niños y niñas en el Grado de Educación Infantil. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 14(1), 258-270. http://ojs.uca.es/index.php/tavira/article/viewFile/962/982

Tracey, P. y Stott, N. (2017). Social innovation: A window on alternative ways of organizing and innovating. Innova-tion: Organization & Management, 19(1), 51-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1268924

Van der Have, R. P. y Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1923-1935. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010

Wittmayer, J. M., Backhaus, J., Avelino, F., Pel, B., Strasser, T., Kunze, I. y Zuijderwijk, L. (2019). Narratives of change: How social innovation initiatives construct societal transformation. Futures, 112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.06.005

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Estados Unidos:Sage Publications.

Published

08-08-2022

How to Cite

Cadena-López, A., & Rivera-González, G. (2022). The dissemination of chinampera culture in children of Mexico City: Promoting a social innovation initiative. Estudios Sociales Revista De Alimentación Contemporánea Y Desarrollo Regional, 32(60). https://doi.org/10.24836/es.v32i60.1232

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)