La gobernanza del transporte público urbano en México: un comparativo de las localidades de Hermosillo, Sonora y León, Guanajuato
The governance of urban public transportation in Mexico: A comparison of the localities of Hermosillo, Sonora and León, Guanajuato
Abstract
Objective: To find differences and similarities in the evolution of the service of Public Transport of Hermosillo and Leon and its results, as well as to determine the approximation to the good governance of each system. Methodology: Is a comparative study of two relatively similar systems with one difference, the guiding level of service, guided by the adaptation of Hendriks' Good Urban Governance model. Results: Show that the León system obtained a wider range of indicators and support the thesis on organizational capacities (responsiveness and effectiveness) and compensatory powers (resilience) as key factors for good urban governance. Limitations: The study does not analyze the dimensions of Procedural Justice and Counterbalance. Conclusion: Urban governance is sensitive to changes in the institutional structure and that arrangements between public and private actors are not always good urban governance arrangements, so the choice of public policy is not a sufficient explanation for the development trajectory of this service.
Keywords:
regional development, good urban governance, sustainable urban mobility, urban public transport, institutional arrangements, good urban governance arrangements.Abstract
Objective: To find differences and similarities in the evolution of the service of Public Transport of Hermosillo and Leon and its results, as well as to determine the approximation to the good governance of each system. Methodology: Is a comparative study of two relatively similar systems with one difference, the guiding level of service, guided by the adaptation of Hendriks' Good Urban Governance model. Results: Show that the León system obtained a wider range of indicators and support the thesis on organizational capacities (responsiveness and effectiveness) and compensatory powers (resilience) as key factors for good urban governance. Limitations: The study does not analyze the dimensions of Procedural Justice and Counterbalance. Conclusion: Urban governance is sensitive to changes in the institutional structure and that arrangements between public and private actors are not always good urban governance arrangements, so the choice of public policy is not a sufficient explanation for the development trajectory of this service.
Keywords:
regional development, good urban governance, sustainable urban mobility, urban public transport, institutional arrangements, good urban governance arrangements.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Para que sean publicados artículos, ensayos y reseñas críticas en Estudios Sociales, la revista debe contar con la aceptación de parte de los autores/autoras de las condiciones siguientes:
1. Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación del trabajo registrado bajo la licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial (CC-By-NC) que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado, siempre y cuando mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
2. Los autores pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (por ejemplo: incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre y cuando indiquen, claramente, que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
