El seguro agropecuario como instrumento de política pública para la gestión de riesgos en México

Agricultural insurance as a policy instrument for risk management in Mexico

https://doi.org/10.24836/es.v31i57.1100

Authors

  • Raquel Solano-Alonso Universidad Autónoma Chapingo/CIESTAAM
  • J. Reyes Altamirano-Cárdenas Universidad Autónoma Chapingo/CIESTAAM https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9937-7179
  • Vinicio Horacio Santoyo-Cortés Universidad Autónoma Chapingo/CIESTAAM
  • Manrrubio Muñoz-Rodríguez Universidad Autónoma Chapingo/CIESTAAM

Abstract

Objective: Analyzes the way in which public policies related to agricultural insurance as an instrument for risk management, have formed the current National Insurance System for the Rural Environment (SNAMR). Methodology: Documentary information was used, and descriptive analysis was applied to databases related to the operation of the insurance in the different stages of development. Results: The historical analysis of the development of the insurance reflects three stages. It starts from the beginning of the insurance offer in a mutual scheme. Later going on to a state monopoly until achieving a current scheme of public-private association in which the state promotes the participation of Insurance Funds insurance and private companies; Limitations: The information about the operation of the Insurance Funds is not public, so we worked with aggregated information. Conclusions: In the last 28 years, on three times, the indemnities paid have exceeded the premiums collected. This shows the technical and financial viability of agricultural insurance; although Mexico has a regulatory framework strengthened by its historical experience in insurance management, which has been oriented towards the development and penetration of agricultural insurance, this objective has not, yet been fully achieved, since the Market sustainability is largely granted by the State.

Keywords:

regional development, risk management, agricultural insurance, public policies, insurance funds, climatic risks

Abstract

Objective: Analyzes the way in which public policies related to agricultural insurance as an instrument for risk management, have formed the current National Insurance System for the Rural Environment (SNAMR). Methodology: Documentary information was used, and descriptive analysis was applied to databases related to the operation of the insurance in the different stages of development. Results: The historical analysis of the development of the insurance reflects three stages. It starts from the beginning of the insurance offer in a mutual scheme. Later going on to a state monopoly until achieving a current scheme of public-private association in which the state promotes the participation of Insurance Funds insurance and private companies; Limitations: The information about the operation of the Insurance Funds is not public, so we worked with aggregated information. Conclusions: In the last 28 years, on three times, the indemnities paid have exceeded the premiums collected. This shows the technical and financial viability of agricultural insurance; although Mexico has a regulatory framework strengthened by its historical experience in insurance management, which has been oriented towards the development and penetration of agricultural insurance, this objective has not, yet been fully achieved, since the Market sustainability is largely granted by the State.

Keywords:

regional development, risk management, agricultural insurance, public policies, insurance funds, climatic risks

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Raquel Solano-Alonso, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo/CIESTAAM

Estudiante del Doctorado en Problemas Económico Agroindustriales Universidad Autónoma Chapingo – CIESTAAM

J. Reyes Altamirano-Cárdenas, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo/CIESTAAM

J. Reyes Altamirano Cárdenas. Profesor-Investigador en la Universidad Autónoma Chapingo- Centro de Investigaciones Económicas Sociales y Tecnológicas de la Agroindustria y la Agricultura Mundial. Dirección para correspondencia: km 38.5 Carretera México-Texcoco, Chapingo, Estado de México, C.P. 56230. Correo-e: jreyesa@ciestaam.edu.mx. ORCID: 0000-0002-9937-7179

Vinicio Horacio Santoyo-Cortés, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo/CIESTAAM

Profesor Investigador del CIESTAAM, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo

Manrrubio Muñoz-Rodríguez, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo/CIESTAAM

Profesor Investigador del CIESTAAM, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo

References

Aguilar-Villanueva, L. F. (2004). Política pública: origen y tendencias actuales de la disciplina. En E. Pérez-Villalba y J. Baca del Moral (Eds.), Análisis de políticas públicas para el desarrollo agrícola y rural (pp. 11-26). México: Universidad Autónoma Chapingo.

Albarracin, J. (2002). La teoría del riesgo y el manejo del concepto riesgo en las sociedades agropecuarias andinas (CIDES, ed.). La Paz: Universidad Mayor de San Andres UMSA.

Arrow, K. J. (1996). The theory of risk-bearing: Small and great risks. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 12(2-3), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055788

Banco de México (2019). Índice Nacional de Precios al Consumidor (INPC).

Boehlje, M. D. y Lins, D. A. (1998). Risk and risk management in an industrialized agriculture. Agricultural Finance Review, 58, 1-16.

Chavas, J. P. (2004). The Measurement of Risk. Risk analysis in theory and practice (pp. 5-19 (256)).

Comisión Nacional de Seguros y Fianzas (CNSF, 2018). Anuarios estadísticos 2000 al 2017.

Comisión Nacional de Seguros y Fianzas (CNSF, 2019). Revista Actualidad en Seguros y Fianzas 2000-2018. México.

Cummins, J. D. y Mahul, O. (2009). Catastrophe Risk Financing in Developing Countries. Principles for public inntervention. Washington, D. C.: The World Bank.

Díaz, T. E. (2006). El seguro agropecuario en México: experiencias recientes. México: CEPAL-ONU.

Duncan, J. y Myers, R. J. (2000). Crop insurance under catastrophic risk. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(4), 842-855. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230226203.0205

Formetta, G. y Feyen, L. (2019). Empirical evidence of declining global vulnerability to climate-related hazards. Global Environmental Change, 57(enero), 101920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.05.004

Hazell, P. B. R. (1992). The appropriate role of agricultural insurance in developing countries. Journal of International Development, 4(6), 567-581.

Iturrioz, R. (2009). Agricultural Insurance. En World Bank. Washington, D. C.

Karlan, D., Osei, R., Osei-Akoto, I. y Udry, C. (2014). Agricultural decisions after relaxing credit and risk constraints. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(2), 597-652. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju002.Advance

Liesivaara, P. y Myyrä, S. (2016). The demand for public-private crop insurance and government disaster relief. Journal of Policy Modeling, 39(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2016.12.001

Luhmann, N. (2006). Sociología del riesgo (3a.edición). México: Universidad Iberoamericana.

Mahul, O. y Stutley, C. J. (2010). The Economic Rationale for Public Intervention in Agricultural Insurance. Government Support to Agricultural Insurance. Challenges and options for developing countries (pp. 29-55 (250). Washington, D. C.: World Bank.

Miranda, M. J. y Glauber, J. W. (1997). Systemic Risk, Reinsurance, and the Failure of Crop Insurance Markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(1), 206-215. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243954

Porth, L. y Seng Tan, K. (2015). Agricultural insurance. More room to Grow? The Actuary Magazine, 12(2), 1-3.

Saldaña-Zorrilla, S. O. (2015). Assessment of disaster risk management in mexico. Disaster Prevention and Management, 24(2), 230-248. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-11-2013-0201

Wenner, M. y Arias, D. (2003). Agricultural Insurance in Latin America: Where Are We? Conference: Paving the Way Forward for Rural Finance: An International Conference on Best Practices, (2-3 june). Washington, D. C.: USAID.

Wilches-Chaux, G. (1993). La vulnerabilidad global. En A. Maskrey (Ed.), Los desastres no son naturales (pp. 11-44). Panamá: Red de Estudios Sociales en Prevención de Desastres en América Latina.

World Bank (2013). Strengthening a Successful Public-Private Partnership. Agriculture Insurance Market Review. Washington, D. C.

Yesuf, M. y Bluffstone, R. A. (2009). Poverty, risk aversion, and path dependence in low-income countries: Experimental evidence from Ethiopia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(4), 1022-1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01307.x

Published

01-06-2021

How to Cite

Solano-Alonso, R., Altamirano-Cárdenas, J. R., Santoyo-Cortés, V. H., & Muñoz-Rodríguez, M. (2021). Agricultural insurance as a policy instrument for risk management in Mexico. Estudios Sociales Revista De Alimentación Contemporánea Y Desarrollo Regional, 31(57). https://doi.org/10.24836/es.v31i57.1100

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.